Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Club News


6 September 2018

Owner looking for change in compensation figures and calls for FA and EFL to protect homegrown development

Marcus Evans has voiced his frustrations at the current compensation system regarding Academy players.

Town have lost four promising young players over the last few years, three of them before they had taken up the offer of a two year scholarship at the Academy having been at the Club for many years. 

Harry Clarke joined Arsenal, Charlie Brown went to Chelsea and most recently Ben Knight signed for Manchester City, while young professional Kundai Benyu, turned down a much improved new contract at Portman Road in 2017 to head to Celtic for a nominal fee under the FIFA training compensation rules.

“My problem is with the rules, not the clubs. I want to make that clear,” Town’s owner told the Club website.

“Ipswich Town and others, including some Premier League clubs, are losing their best young talent before they even join the full-time Academy ranks on leaving school and with it, in our case, one of the channels to assist us to progress to the Premier League.

“I continue to remain fully committed to our Academy and producing homegrown players. It’s a major part of the Club’s strategy, however if in the long term the situation worsens and we lose all of our best talent before they even start in the Academy, the strategy is thrown into doubt for us and other clubs.

"We have already seen some clubs close their Academies and the FA as well as the EFL must do everything they can to protect the current number of Academies.

“I’m told we had more players aged under 23 on the pitch last season than any other team in the Championship and we achieved an EPPP [Elite Player Performance Plan] score which was in line with some of the Category 1 level clubs. 

“We also have a number of Academy players who are regulars in their respective age groups at international level, proving our ability to develop a quantity of talented players.

“It is frustrating though to be put in a position where we invest in a young player from the age of nine for several years and then are forced to lose him for a fee well below what I would consider to be a true valuation of that potential.

“We fully respect that at the age of 15 a person can’t be bound to a club based solely on their location and if the player wants to move on for valid personal reasons, so be it.

“However, more often than not, these decisions are influenced by money and if it’s about money then the club that has developed the player should be fairly rewarded, as the club taking the player is doing so for their own financial advantage.

“This is where the current rules break down and we have accepted figures that were, in effect, forced upon us based on the most likely outcome of a compensation fee tribunal.

“That’s where - in my opinion – the problem and the potential solution to the problem lies. As long as the compensation figures are high enough then the ‘losing’ club is rewarded.

“At the moment the tribunal valuations for the loss of a talented player to the top Premier League clubs bears no relation to the potential of the player.

“I’ll give you an example. We had no choice but to agree a fee of £600,000 with a Premier League club for one of our young players with a possible additional £900,000 but only if he played 100 games for that club in the Premier League . If he played 100 games in the Premier League, at current values he’d probably be worth £30m plus.

“The figures just don’t add up and this is against a background of the league stipulating we must have an Academy budget of £2.5 million per annum and we are seeing on average only one in 20 scholars making it to even Championship level and an even smaller percentage to the Premier League. This will drop substantially if we lose the best talent before they become scholars .

“While the initial fee can be kept reasonable, the contingent add on payments are where the problem lies. If tribunals reflected the true future value, then in my opinion that would go a long way to solving the problem.

“If clubs had confidence in the tribunal system this would ease some of the concerns and I will be encouraging further discussions as to how the compensation levels should be assessed.

“I know from talking to other owners, particularly those in the larger cities, that they are questioning the value of paying for an Academy. A few have already closed and I would suggest that a dangerous tipping point maybe reached when several clubs follow each other if they keep losing their best players for next to nothing.”

Marcus also emphasises the importance of having a universal agreement in place across the rest of Europe, as well as the domestic game.

Town feared losing one of the youngsters to a leading European club for around £100,000, with the owner saying: “It is all worthless if the foreign clubs don’t have to abide by the same rules as us.

“Otherwise, even with the fairer compensation levels I have suggested between English clubs, this would only provide more opportunities for foreign clubs to 'steal' talent for next to nothing.

“Medium size and smaller football clubs are the lifeblood of football, if everything moves towards those clubs never progressing; it would be short-sighted to think that football will not be affected in the long term.”


Advertisement block